Journal Articles
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12504/59
Browse
Browsing Journal Articles by Author "Kizito, Michael George"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Herbalists in a digital aeon : neo-liberalism and the ethics of informal medicine in Uganda(Jumuga Journal of Education, Oral Studies, and Human Sciences, 2026-05-22) Kizito, Michael George; Ssebunya, MargaretIn the 21st century, Uganda’s social milieu is witnessing a paradigm shift, from formal to informal medicine. This has been occasioned by the upsurge of information technology, in terms of radios, televisions, mobile phone technology and the internet. Unlike formal medical practitioners who are under a stringent obligation to avoid advertising their medical services, informal medical practitioners, such as: traditional herbalists, are utilizing the power of the air waves to advertise their services. The immense advertisement by informal practitioners has created the impression that informal medicine is more efficient and curative than formal pharmacology. Surprisingly, some of these informal pharmacology techniques are more costly than the formal ones. The fundamental problem of informal medicine still lies in its persisting situatedness in mysticism, myth, and anachronism. This implies that it is deficient of painstaking pharmacological experimentation and diagnosis. In Uganda, the article argues, neo-liberal politics has taken precedence over painstaking and efficacious pharmacology; and this is evident in the fact that there are no sustainable codes of ethics to regulate herbal medicine in the country. This has debilitating implications on patients’ right to health and patients’ empowerment.Item Non-human animal rights jurisprudence in moral law and positive law: meta-philosophical disputations(Jumuga Journal of Education, 2026-04) Kizito, Michael GeorgeNon-Human animal rights have become the vogue since the beginning of the 20th century. Positivist oriented scholars especially from the disciplines of anthropology, law, and political science have contended that humans are not special and are far better than animals because they are all part of the evolutionary continuity. According to these scholars, it is scientifically proven that non-human animals also speak languages, have morality and empathy like humans. They thus propose that non-human animals should be accorded rights analogous to human rights enshrined in international human rights instruments such as; the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). The failure to heed to this scientific predicament is regarded as equivocally consistent with human supremacism, exceptionalism and speciesism. This meta-philosophical master piece assesses the intricacies of instituting soft and hard law non-human animal rights instruments such as; the Universal Declaration of Non-Human Animal Rights (UDNHAR) and the International Covenant on Non-Human Animals’ Social and Economic Rights(ICNHASER). It is premised on the argument that non-human animals should be accorded justiciable sentient privileges, sympathies and empathies instead of rights because they are amoral beings. The article contends that guaranteeing nonhuman animals justiciable sentient privileges is tantamount to sentient realism and not human supremacism, exceptionalism and speciesism.